Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Preventing the Occurrence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Doctors in University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders affecting medical personnel should never be treated lightly. It has thus become necessary to strictly infuse ergonomics in medical practice in order to tackle the occurrence of musculoskeletal system disorders. This would ensure better productivity among the medical personnel. This research was conducted to determine the knowledge, attitude and practice of the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among doctors working at the University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study design was employed in carrying out this study among doctors working at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Multistage sampling was utilized in selecting a sample population of 223 doctors for this study. Data collection was done using a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire. Ethical approval to conduct this study was gotten from the University of Port-Harcourt research ethics committee. Consent, confidentiality, privacy and beneficence were ensured in this study. For test of associations, statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results: Majority of the respondents had good knowledge and attitude towards musculoskeletal disorders’ prevention at work. The practice of ergonomic principles was however not satisfactory. Occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among study respondents was significantly associated with the knowledge and practice of ergonomic principles required to prevent the occurrence of these disorders.
Conclusion: Despite the significant proportion of doctors in this study having good knowledge and attitude towards prevention of musculoskeletal system disorders at work, only few of these doctors satisfactorily practiced the necessary preventive measures necessary to prevent these disorders. This inadvertently resulted in the high prevalence of these disorders found in this study. It is recommended that a re-orientation of doctors to be more involved in the actual application of ergonomics while working no matter the compulsion or desire to get the work done should be done.

Introduction

Health-care workers are constantly exposed to workplace hazards which could be biological, chemical, physical, social, or mechanical in nature. These hazards and continuous exposure to them are known to bring about deleterious effects on the well-being of those exposed, who in this case, are doctors providing health care and include physicians, dentists, hematologists, pathologists, radiologists, and surgeons.[1-4] During treatment sessions, doctors in different specialties of medicine are exposed to hazards related to a strained posture which exerts a destabilizing effect on the osteoarticular system of the body, thus invariably having negative effects on the affected muscles and joints and resulting in musculoskeletal system disorders. These disorders have the propensity of adversely affecting the health and practice of those affected.[5-9]

To prevent the occurrence of these disorders, it is necessary that ergonomic principles are infused in all aspects of medical practice. This would ensure better productivity and job satisfaction among the personnel.[9-11] However, for effective application of the principle of ergonomics to prevent these disorders, doctors must first have good knowledge of the risk factors implicated in their occurrence and how to apply the principles. Ergonomics is an applied science involving processes, procedures, and product design which ensures work efficiency and the health and safety of the worker. It involves applying theory, principles, and design in an occupational environment to ensure optimal human well-being and overall system performance.[12] Required goals for the application of ergonomics in medical practice include reduced pain and morbidities associated with medical practice, decreased stress while working, improved musculoskeletal health and vigor, increased comfort at work, increased productivity while working, career span improvement as well as improved quality of life.[3]

Practices encouraging the prevention of the occurrence of these disorders include ensuring that the working chair/stool be fashioned to support the worker in neutral posture by being fully adjustable and having a broad base and a little forward tilt in order for easy achievability of optimal access, clear visibility, and comfort while working. Others include good use of the backrest to ensure optimum lumbar support of the body trunk, avoiding flexed back positions, alternating working postures to allow for muscle recovery as well as exercising including head rotations (in the 4 different planes of movement). More of these practices include looking away from work area and focusing eyes at the ceiling for some seconds, shoulder shrugging, clasping of fingers behind the occipital region of the head, interlacing fingers and turning the palms outwards etc. The use of an extra pair of hands while working which is provided by technical assistants, ensuring ergonomic considerations involving equipment/instrument design during their purchase as well as working in a well-illuminated environment with the temperature well -adjusted to promote adequate muscular blood circulation are all effective practices that could encourage the prevention of these disorders.[3,10-14]

Knowledge as well as the actual practice of necessary principles required for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) remains an issue to be addressed considering reports from a number of studies. In a study among dental students and dental practitioners, only 21.4% of respondents had good knowledge of ergonomics application to prevent these disorders with an attendant report that only 10.7% of the study respondents had good practice scores of ergonomics in preventing disorders of the musculoskeletal system.[15] Health workers who had poor knowledge of applying ergonomic principles at work and were thus unable to avoid factors associated with the development of adverse health conditions (including disorders of the musculoskeletal system) have also been reported.[16] In another study, 50.64% of respondents were reported to have no knowledge of applying ergonomics in preventing musculoskeletal system disorders.[17] However, on the contrary, in another study, authors reported a satisfactory knowledge and attitude toward ergonomics among students in preventing musculoskeletal system disorders. This is evidenced by 52% and 75% overall mean knowledge and attitude scores obtained, respectively, in their study.[18] Furthermore, in a Pakistani study on the ergonomic hazards to dental surgeons, it was reported that all the respondents supported the importance of maintaining ideal working postures, thus showing a high proportion with a positive attitude.[19] This notwithstanding, only 8.3% of the respondents always applied ergonomics while working while 26.4% applied it most of the time. However, 64.5% of them seldom applied the principle of ergonomics while working with a resultant majority coming down with these disorders.[19] Karibasappa et al.[20] also reported that 75–87.23% of respondents had good attitude toward the application of ergonomics in their medical practice. However, only 34–49% of the respondents in their study practiced the application of ergonomics by adopting working postures that were adequate to prevent the occurrence of these disorders.

Having identified this problem and seeing its ability to reduce work efficiency and general well-being of doctors coupled with the absence of published data to confirm these reports among doctors working at the University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH), Rivers State, Nigeria; it has, thus, become necessary to conduct this research as it would provide lacking epidemiological data on the need to ensure the application of ergonomics in clinical practice due to the vulnerabilities that the practice exposes its practitioners to. It would also provide a stimulating effect capable of spurring required agencies of government into action that ensures the optimal maintenance of the health and efficiency of her medical personnel. It is, thus, necessary to conduct this study to determine the knowledge, attitude, and practice of WRMSDs among doctors working at the UPTH.

Materials and Methods

The descriptive, cross-sectional study design was used in carrying out this research study. This study was conducted at the UPTH which is located along the East–West road at Choba, Obi-Akpor Local Government Area of Port Harcourt metropolis. Alongside the provision of clinical services round the clock, UPTH also provides clinical training and education to health-care professionals. A typical day at work at the UPTH involves delivering medical care to both in- and out-patients and provides clinical training and education to health-care professionals.[21,22]

Using Fisher’s formula: n = Zα2pq/d2, the minimum sample size was calculated.[23] Where: n = minimum sample size required, Zα = value corresponding to the confidence level of 95% which is 1.96. p = percentage or proportion of the attribute of interest from the previous study. In this case musculoskeletal disorder; q = 100-p, d = error margin (5%). A proportion of 84.4% was gotten from a previous study,[24] thus: n=1.962 × (84.4*15.6)/52 = (3.8416 × 1316.64)/25 = 5058.00/25 = 202. 223 respondents were finally selected considering a 10% non-response rate. A multistage sampling was conducted. The first stage was a stratified sampling of the population into the different specialties of medical practice presently providing health-care services at the UPTH. The second stage was a stratified sampling of the doctors into their different working cadres which included consultants, senior registrars, and registrars. The third stage involved the selection of respondents based on availability and willingness to participate in the study considering the increased workload on the study respondents as a result of the industrial action organized by the Joint Health Sector Unions during the course of carrying out this study. Data collection was done over a period of 14 days with the help of a research assistant who was educated on the objectives of the research and on how to ensure proper data collection.

A semi-structured self-administered questionnaire was used as the study instrument. The questionnaire was adapted from pre-existing templates.[11,25-27] The questionnaire probed the presence or absence of musculoskeletal disorders. The knowledge of the respondents regarding ergonomics application to prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system while at work was also probed. Yes and no options were provided for 15 questions asked in this section. 12 positively worded and 3 questions having negative responses were asked to elicit their knowledge of how to prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system. Examples of questions having positive responses asked included if taking adequate breaks between work procedures prevented disorders of the musculoskeletal system, if keeping the shoulders relaxed could prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system, if forceful hand exertions have the propensity result in disorders of the musculoskeletal system, if frequent lifting of heavy equipment at work could contribute to disorders of the musculoskeletal system, if stretching exercises could be useful in preventing disorders of the musculoskeletal system from occurring amongst others. Questions having negative responses asked included if rest while working could contribute to the occurrence of musculoskeletal system disorders, if grasping small instruments for long periods could prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system etc. Correctly answering between 11 and 15 questions was regarded as having good knowledge. Correctly answering between 6 and 10 questions was regarded as having fair knowledge, and correctly answering between 1 and 5 questions was regarded as having poor knowledge.

The next section sought their attitude toward the application of ergonomics in preventing the occurrence of disorders of the musculoskeletal system. Yes and no options were provided for 10 questions asked in this section. 6 negatively worded and 4 questions having positive responses were asked to elicit their attitude toward ergonomics application in preventing disorders of the musculoskeletal system. Questions having negative responses included if it was preferable to bend the head forward instead of adjusting the workspace in a bid to view the workspace better, if they could not do without bending their backs while working, and if taking breaks while working was a waste of time amongst others. Questions having positive responses asked included if keeping the back supported while working was always a considered option, if applying ergonomic principles at work to avoid disorders of the musculoskeletal system was an achievable task among others. Correctly answering between 6 and 10 questions was regarded as having a good attitude, and correctly answering between 1 and 5 questions was regarded as having a poor attitude.

Finally, ergonomic practices applied at the workplace were also elicited. This was a multiple choice question, in which respondents were allowed to choose all options that applied to them. 15 options were provided and they included gentle hand movements, changing positions while working, placing feet flat on the floor while working, taking intermittent breaks while working, keeping the back supported while sitting as well as working with assistance when necessary. Others included keeping the shoulders relaxed while working, keeping the neck tilted only within safe limits, ensuring and/or advocating ergonomically considered shift duties, adjustment of workspace for better viewing and engaging in physical activity while working.

The last batch of options included consciously positioning body within safe ergonomic limits while working, consideration of ergonomic principles when purchasing work tools, materials and equipment; stopping work activity for a while when discomfort arose and ensuring orderliness of work instruments while working

Application of 11–15 ergonomic practices was regarded as having good practice. Application of 6–10 ergonomic practices was regarded as having fair practice and application of 1–5 ergonomic practices was regarded as having poor practice. How often the selected measures were applied was also enquired.

The knowledge of the prevention of WRMSDs, attitude toward the application of ergonomic principles in preventing WRMSDs and the ergonomic practices applied to prevent WRMSDs from occurring; were statistically tested for association with the occurrence of WRMSDs using the chi-squared analytical test. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level of significance.

Results

In this study, as shown in Table 1, majority of the respondents were male, 133 (59.6%), and 90 (40.4%) were female. Majority of the respondents, 149 (71.0%), were within the age group of 30–39 years. Majority of the respondents, 150 (67.3%), were married and 73 (32.7%) were single. According to cadre, majority of the respondents were registrars, 150 (67.3%), 45 (20.2%) were senior registrars, and 28 (12.5%) were consultants. Majority of the study respondents (111, 51.4%) had practiced for 1–5 years. Majority of the respondents were surgeons, 132 (59.2%), and the other physicians, 91 (40.8%).

According to Table 2, majority of the respondents, 202 (90.6%), had experienced symptoms of work-related musculoskeletal system disorders in the past 12 months. This, thus, gives a WRMSDs prevalence of 90.6% among the study respondents.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study respondents

Variable	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Age (years)
20–29	14 (6.7)
30–39	149 (71.0)
40–49	39 (18.6)
50–59	6 (2.9)
60–69	2 (1.0)
Gender
Male	133 (59.6)
Female	90 (40.4)
Marital status
Single	150 (67.3)
Married	73 (32.7)
Cadre
Registrar	150 (67.3)
Senior registrar	45 (20.2)
Consultant	28 (12.5)
Years of practice (years)
1–5	111 (51.4)
6–10	66 (30.6)
11–15	20 (9.2)
>20	19 (8.8)
Specialty
Surgeons	132 (59.2)
Physicians	91 (40.8)

Table 2. Prevalence of musculoskeletal system disorders

Experience of MSD symptom	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Yes	202 (90.6)
No	21 (9.4)

Table 3 shows that majority of the respondents had good knowledge (215, 96.4%) as they were able to correctly respond to eleven or more of 15 questions asked to assess their knowledge. 8 (3.6%) of the respondents, however, had fair knowledge regarding WRMSD prevention. No respondent had poor knowledge of the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal system disorders.

Table 3. Knowledge of workrelated musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention

Level of knowledge	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Good knowledge (selected 11–15 correct options)	215 (96.4)
Fair knowledge (selected 6–10 correct options)	8 (3.6)
Poor knowledge (selected 1–5 correct options)	0 (0.0)

With reference to the 6 negatively worded and 4 questions having positive responses asked to elicit respondents’ attitude toward WRMSD prevention, Table 4 shows that majority of the respondents 216 (96.9%) had a good attitude toward WRMSDs’ prevention. 7 (3.1%) of the respondents, however, had a poor attitude toward WRMSDs’ prevention.

Table 4. Attitude toward workrelated musculoskeletal disorder prevention

Attitude	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Good attitude (selected 6–10 correct options)	216 (96.9)
Poor attitude (selected 1–5 correct options)	7 (3.1)

With reference to the ergonomic principles for which the respondents were assessed for practice to prevent work-related musculoskeletal system disorders, Table 5 shows that the most practiced principle was the changing of positions while working 196 (87.9%) followed by keeping the back supported when sitting 173 (77.6%), keeping the shoulders relaxed while working 173 (77.6%), taking intermittent breaks while working 172 (77.1%), and ensuring gentle hand movements while working 155 (69.5%) among others. Keeping the neck tilted as well as consideration of ergonomic principles when purchasing work materials, tools and/or equipment were, however, the least practiced ergonomic principles.

Table 5. Ergonomic principles practiced by respondents

*There were multiple responses

Ergonomic principles	Frequency
Changing positions while working	196
Keeping back supported while sitting	173
Keeping shoulders relaxed while working	173
Taking intermittent breaks while working	172
Ensuring gentle hand movements	155
Engaging in physical activity while working, e.g., stretching etc.	121
Ensuring and/or advocating for ergonomically considered shift duties	120
Adjusting the workspace for better operatorpatient positioning	113
Working with assistance when necessary	112
Stopping work activity for a while when discomfort arises	102
Ensuring orderliness of work instruments while working	57
Consciously positioning the body within safe ergonomic limits while working	53
Placing feet flat on the floor when working	51
Keeping neck tilted only within safe limits	50
Consideration of ergonomic principles when purchasing work materials, tools and/or equipment	29

With reference to the 15 ergonomic principles enquired about from which respondents selected the practices that they applied when at work, Table 6 shows that majority of the study respondents fairly practiced these principles 145 (65.0%). 31 (13.9%) had a good level of practice of these ergonomic principles; however, 47 (21.1%) respondents poorly practiced these ergonomic principles. As shown in Table 7, it was also found that these principles were mostly only practiced sometimes 153 (68.6%) by the study respondents. 51 (22.9%) respondents rarely practiced them, whereas only 18 (8.1%) respondents always practiced these ergonomic principles while at work. 1 (0.4%) respondent, however, never practiced these ergonomic principles.

Table 6. Level of ergonomic principles practiced by the respondents

Level of practice	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Good practice (applied 11–15 ergonomic practices)	31 (13.9)
Fair practice (applied 6–10 ergonomic practices)	145 (65.0)
Poor practice (applied 1–5 ergonomic practices)	47 (21.1)

Table 7. Frequency of practice of the ergonomic principles

Frequency of practice	Frequency ( n =223) (%)
Always	18	8.1
Sometimes	153	68.6
Rarely	51	22.9
Never	1	0.4

With reference to work practices precipitating work-related musculoskeletal system disorders among the study respondents, Table 8 shows that working for prolonged periods without rest or breaks 135 (60.5%) was the most occurring practice reported to precipitate symptoms of work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system. This was followed by standing for long periods while working 120 (53.8%) as well as sitting for long periods while working 93 (41.7%).

Table 8. Work practices precipitating workrelated musculoskeletal system disorders

*There were multiple responses

Work practices	Frequency
Working for long periods without rest	135
Standing for long periods while working	120
Sitting for long periods while working	93
Occurrence of repetitive hand movements while working	64
Working while sitting on an unadjustable chair	47
Bending the neck/back to view work area	44
Working with a chair having no backrest	34
Maintaining fixed neck postures while working	31
Grasping work instruments for prolonged periods	20
Lifting heavy workplace equipment	14
Carrying patient samples	12
Use of vibrating tools/equipment at work	6

Table 9 shows a statistically significant association between knowledge and practice of WRMSDs’ prevention and the presence of WRMSDs. The table shows that respondents have a good knowledge of work-related musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention presented with more cases of symptoms of musculoskeletal system disorders than those having fair knowledge of how to prevent work-related musculoskeletal system disorders (P = 0.006). The table also shows that respondents with a fair or poor level of practice of ergonomic principles that prevent the occurrence of work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system presented with more cases of symptoms of disorders of the musculoskeletal system than those with a good level of practice of ergonomic principles that prevent the occurrence of work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system (P = 0.000).

Table 9. Association between knowledge, attitude, and practice of the prevention of WRMSDs and the occurrence of WRMSDs

*Signifies a significant association between variables. WRMSDs: Workrelated musculoskeletal disorders

Variable	Workrelated musculoskeletal disorder	df	χ 2 ( P value)
Present	Absent	Total
Knowledge				1	7.672 (0.006)*
Good (11–15)	197 (91.6)	18 (8.4)	215 (96.4)
Fair (6–10)	5 (62.5)	3 (37.5)	8 (3.6)
Total	202 (90.6)	21 (9.4)	223 (100.0)
Attitude				1	0.201 (0.654)
Good (6–10)	196 (90.7)	20 (9.3)	216 (96.9)
Poor (1–5)	6 (85.7)	1 (14.3)	7 (3.1)
Total	202 (90.6)	21 (9.4)	223 (100.0)
Practice				1	16.240 (0.000)*
Good (11–15)	22 (71.0)	9 (29.0)	31 (13.9)
Fair/Poor (6–10/1–5)	180 (93.7)	12 (6.3)	192 (86.1)
Total	202 (90.6)	21 (9.4)	223 (100.0)

Discussion

For effective application of ergonomic principles in preventing work-related musculoskeletal system disorders, it is important that health personnel including doctors should know what these principles are about and how they can be achieved. On this premise, an assessment of knowledge of musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work was carried out in this study. This assessment showed that majority of the respondents had good knowledge 217 (96.4%) of musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work. 8 (3.6%) of the respondents, however, had fair knowledge regarding musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work. No respondent had poor knowledge of musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work. This high proportion of study respondents having good knowledge of how to prevent these work-related disorders is in line with the findings of the study by Kalghatgi et al.,[18] in which satisfactory knowledge of ergonomics among dental professionals in preventing musculoskeletal system disorders was reported. Another study also corroborates the results of this study, in which satisfactory knowledge about ergonomics was reported among dentistry students.[15]

This high proportion of knowledge among study respondents is, however, not supported by the results of previous research in which it was reported that as much as 50.64% of respondents had no knowledge of ergonomics.[17] Having such large proportions of workers having poor knowledge of ergonomics or its application has been shown by literature to be detrimental to the ability to imbibe practices that would prevent work-related musculoskeletal system disorders due to their being not able to stay away from factors that have been associated with these disorders.[16] In relation to knowledge, it has been shown that, when years of clinical experience are combined with informal training among practicing health personnel, there tends to be better knowledge and practice of ergonomics with an attendant low musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevalence among this health personnel when compared with student trainees.[15]

In this study, the attitude of the respondents toward the application of ergonomic principles to prevent work-related musculoskeletal was assessed. This assessment showed that majority of the respondents had good attitude toward musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work 218 (96.9%). This result is also in line with the findings of Kalghatgi et al.[18] who also reported a high attitude score of 75%. This result is further supported by the results of Bushra et al.[19] who reported that all respondents in their study accepted the importance of applying ergonomics while working. These reports coupled with the finding of this study show that there was a good acceptance of ergonomic practices while at work to prevent work-related musculoskeletal system disorders from occurring. The attitude of the respondents in this study toward the prevention of musculoskeletal system disorders was also significantly associated with the knowledge of the respondents on the prevention of these disorders (P = 0.000). This is also corroborated by the results of authors who reported significantly good knowledge and attitude toward the practice of ergonomics to prevent work-related musculoskeletal system disorders.[20] It should, however, be noted that, when knowledge and attitude are good toward preventing work-related musculoskeletal system disorders, the actual practice of ergonomic principles must be ensured if these work-related disorders are to be prevented.[28]

In this study, only 13.9% of the respondents had a good level of practice of the required ergonomic principles needed to prevent work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system. This finding agrees with the findings of authors who reported that only 10.7% of the study respondents had good practice scores of ergonomics in preventing disorders of the musculoskeletal system.[15] Reports of Karibasappa et al.,[20] are, however, not in line with the findings of this study as 34–49% of the respondents in their study practiced the application of ergonomics by adopting working postures that were adequate. This may have been due to their study setting which sampled only dentists as against doctors of different specialties sampled in this study. This finding is also not in agreement with the findings of authors who reported that 66.25% of the respondents in their study whom had knowledge of ergonomics actually applied the principles while working.[17] This contrary report, however, may have been due to the small sample size (80) used for their study. Other authors in their study also reported a good practice score of 55% which does not agree with the findings of this study.[18]

Despite majority of respondents having good knowledge and attitude toward musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work in this study, majority of respondents in this study also had a low level of practice of the required principles to prevent these disorders. Karibasappa et al.,[20] in their study reported that, despite having good knowledge and attitude toward applying ergonomics to prevent musculoskeletal diseases, the level of practice was poor, and as mentioned previously, this poor practice is capable of influencing work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system.[19] In this study, this is explainable in that majority of study respondents were junior cadre doctors (registrars) who apart from having less number of years of clinical practice, are also the ones assigned bulk of the work, and are usually compelled to perform the tasks within a limited timeframe. Due to these, they usually pay less attention to ergonomics application in their clinical practice. This is further buttressed by the theory that, unless and until the practice of a preventive measure is adequate, the actual prevention of the particular disorder may not be achieved even though knowledge and attitude toward preventing the disorder are adequate.[28,29]

It is important to note that these principles were only practiced sometimes by majority (68.4%) of the study respondents and practiced always by only 8.0% of the respondents. As much as 22.7% of the respondents rarely practiced these principles, and two doctors (0.9%) reported never practicing these necessary ergonomic principles. This further buttresses the point that, when poor ergonomic practices are prevalent at the workplace, there is a tendency for work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system to occur. The positive effects of having good knowledge and attitude in preventing work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system from occurring can only, therefore, be achieved when the required ergonomic principles are effectively practiced.[28,30-32]

Ergonomic principles significantly shown to have good protective effects from disorders of the musculoskeletal system among our study respondents included stopping work activity for some time whenever discomfort arose, keeping the back supported while sitting at work, ensuring orderliness of work instruments while working, and placing the feet flat on the floor while working amongst others. This finding is supported by previous literature, in which these ergonomic principles and practices were reported as necessary ways to ensure that work-related musculoskeletal system disorders were prevented from occurring.[6,10-12]

It has been earlier shown that having good knowledge of how to prevent these disorders should result in having a reduction in the prevalence of the disorders. However, despite the high proportion of respondents having good knowledge of how to prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system (96.4%), there was still a high prevalence of disorders of the musculoskeletal system among them. This could be explainable by majority of the doctors involved in this study being registrars who are usually involved in carrying out a number of duties assigned to them by their senior registrars and consultants. The high prevalence of the disorder in this study could also be as a result of the attitude of the respondents toward the practice of ergonomic principles to prevent disorders of the musculoskeletal system from occurring as well as the actual practice of these ergonomic principles by the registrars in this study who form a majority and who may not have had as much practice clinical experience as to effectively applying the principles of ergonomics in their practice.[14,16,19]

Respondents with a fair or poor level of practice of musculoskeletal system disorders’ prevention at work presented with more cases of symptoms of disorders of the musculoskeletal system than those with a good level of practice (P = 0.000). This finding is corroborated by the findings of authors who both reported that, when the necessary ergonomic principles are not applied, there is usually a resultant occurrence of work-related disorders of the musculoskeletal system.[17,19]

Conclusion

In this study, it was found that majority of the respondents had good knowledge and attitude toward prevention of musculoskeletal system disorders at work. The practice of ergonomic principles necessary for the prevention of these disorders of the musculoskeletal system was, however, not satisfactory. It is recommended that health personnel should be re-oriented to be more involved in the actual application of ergonomics while working no matter the compulsion or desire to get work done. Strict adherence to leave periods and properly utilizing such periods to rest the musculoskeletal system of the body were also recommended.